APHC010257922013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30682/2013 Between: 1. MR. ABUL KAREEM KHAN,, S/O. MOHAMMAD KHAN, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, MINOR, REP. BY HIS NATURAL FATHER SRI. MOHAMMAD KHAN, S/O.MOULA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC:GOVERNMENT SERVICE, R/O.H.NO. 50-120-5/1, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P. 2. NAZEER AHMED KHAN,, S/O. S/O. MOHAMMAD KHAN, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, OCC:STUDENT, MINOR, REP. BY HIS NATURAL FATHER SRI. MOHAMMAD KHAN, S/O.MOULA KHAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC:GOVERNMENT SERVICE, R/O.H.NO. 50-120-5/1, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS, INDIA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI. 2. ALL INDIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION AITA, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT MR.ANIL K.KHANNA, R/O. R.K.KHANNA TENNIS STADIUM, NEW DELHI- 110 029,INDIA. 3. ALL INDIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION AITA, REP. BY ITS HON'BLE EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY GENERAL, OFFICE AT R/O. R.K.KHANNA TENNIS STADIUM, NEW DELHI-110 029, INDIA. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 1 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and it amounts to violation of Arts. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set-aside the impugned letter 03-10-2013 issued by the Respondents 2 to 3 and direct the Respondents 2 to 3 to issue I.D. Cards and permit them to participate in All India Tennis Ranking Tournaments according to their age group, and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 38090 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 1-3 to issue I.D cards and permit them to participate all India Tennis Ranking Tournaments according to thir age group, pending disposal of the main WP and pass. IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 177070 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAMA RAO GANTANNAGARI 2. P RAJA SRIPATHI RAO The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Smt. Ch. Naga Jyothi, learned counsel representing Sri P. Lakshmana rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 3rd September, 2025 cbn 4 242 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.30682 of 2013 3rd September, 2025 cbn