Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45139 (ALL)

MAZAHHAR HUSSAIN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 ORS.

WRIA/38696/2016 · 2025-09-14

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 38696 of 2016 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed with the following prayer:- " I. Issue the writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the petitioner's application dated 16.02.2013 pending before the respondent no. 3." 3. The petitioner was appointed on 09.01.2009 as Teacher of (Science) in Madarsa Attariya Tareen Jalalnagar, Kuraisi Maszid, Shahjahanpur and honorarium of Rs. 6,000/- per month was being paid to him. A letter was sent by respondent no. 3/District Minority Welfare Officer Shahajahnpur to respondent no. 2/Director Minority Welfare U.P. 620 Indira Bhawan, Lucknow for payment of Rs. 12,000/- as honorarium as per the qualification of the teacher concered. Accordingly, a recommendation was made by respondent no. 3 for considering the payment of the teachers by letter dated 20.06.13 as well as 16.06.2014. The petitioner represented but nothing was done. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that in case a fresh representation is moved by the petitioner before respondent no. 3 the same shall be considered in accordance with law. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kukmar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mazahhar Hussain .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. .....Respondent(s) petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 15, 2025 Saurabh WRIA No. 38696 of 2016 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad