IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.594 of 2017 Mukti Kanta Bhuyan …. Petitioner Mr. J. Bhuyan, Advocate -Versus- Ananda Kumar Giri …. Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order No. ORDER 16.10.2025 I.A. No.1045 of 2025 09. 1. This matter was not in today’s list and on being specifically mentioned, it is taken up for hearing. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. Instant I.A. is filed seeking recall of the Court’s order dated 20th August, 2025 in CRLREV No.594 of 2025. 4. The revision was disposed of for non-prosecution after receiving a memo from the learned counsel for the petitioner leading to dismissal of the revision. Today, it is submitted that the revision should be restored for hearing and disposal on merit for the reason stated. 5. Objection of the learned counsel for the opposite party is recorded. 6. In order to ensure disposal of the revision on merit, this Court is inclined to allow the I.A. accepting the plea advanced. 7. Accordingly, it is ordered. 8. I.A. stands disposed of restoring the revision for orders. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge CRLREV No.594 OF 2017 1. In view of the order in I.A. No.1045 of 2025, list this matter on 27th November, 2025 for final hearing and orders. In the meantime, LCR be called for from the learned Court below. The Registry is to do the needful to ensure that the LCR is received by this Court before the next date fixed. 2. Since the revision is restored, the Court’s order dated 1st November, 2017 is allowed to continue till the next date of hearing. 3. The names of Mr. Jagannath Bhuyan, learned counsel and associates appearing for the petitioner be reflected in the cause list henceforth. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Alok