Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45135 (PNJ)

DEVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/20212/2025 · 2025-04-21

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DEVINDER SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking directions to official respondent Nos. to 3 to take action against the private respondents and further prayer is to into representation dated 26.02.2025 No.2. 2. Learned counse his family are in possession of the land, owned by them as per their share even before 1911-1912. petitioner and other occupants of the land. They which were decided in favour of the petitioner and other occupants. Further one CWP No.26497 of 2016 filed by respondent No.9 was dismissed by this Court with a cost of Rs.30,000/ respondents was withdrawn. dispute is pending before the DDPO after being remanded by this Court in CWP No.25529 of 2019 vide order dated 16.10.2024 20.02.2025, the private respondents along with 15 to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DEVINDER SINGH V/S PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking directions to official respondent Nos. take action against the private respondents and further prayer is to representation dated 26.02.2025 (Annexure P Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his family are in possession of the land, owned by them as per their share even 1912. However, the private respondents, started harassing and other occupants of the land. They which were decided in favour of the petitioner and other occupants. Further CWP No.26497 of 2016 filed by respondent No.9 was dismissed by this Court with a cost of Rs.30,000/-. Thereafter, one LPA filed by the private spondents was withdrawn. Learned counsel submits that the matter in dispute is pending before the DDPO after being remanded by this Court in CWP No.25529 of 2019 vide order dated 16.10.2024 20.02.2025, the private respondents along with 15 to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20212-2025 Date of decision: 21.04.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Advocate for the petitioner. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking directions to official respondent Nos.1 take action against the private respondents and further prayer is to look (Annexure P-5) moved to respondent l for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and his family are in possession of the land, owned by them as per their share even However, the private respondents, started harassing the and other occupants of the land. They filed a number of litigations, which were decided in favour of the petitioner and other occupants. Further, CWP No.26497 of 2016 filed by respondent No.9 was dismissed by this Thereafter, one LPA filed by the private Learned counsel submits that the matter in dispute is pending before the DDPO after being remanded by this Court in CWP No.25529 of 2019 vide order dated 16.10.2024. However, on 20.02.2025, the private respondents along with 15 to 20 armed persons tried to MANISHA 2025.04.21 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-20212 dispossess the petitioner but he raised hue and persons working in the nearby fields and the police jeep passing on the main road, due to which, the private respondents along with other persons ran away from the spot. In this regard, the petitioner has submitted an application to respondent No.3 but no action was taken. Thereafter, again on 25.02.2025, the private respondents gave beatings to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondent consider and decide the representatio petitioner in a time bound manner. 4. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 5. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to learned State counsel today itself. 6. Keeping in view the prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P steps in view of the submissions made therein, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. April 21, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 20212-2025 2 dispossess the petitioner but he raised hue and persons working in the nearby fields and the police jeep passing on the main road, due to which, the private respondents along with other persons ran away In this regard, the petitioner has submitted an application to respondent No.3 but no action was taken. Thereafter, again on 25.02.2025, the private respondents gave beatings to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondent consider and decide the representation (Annexure petitioner in a time bound manner. Notice of motion to official respondents only. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to learned State counsel today itself. Keeping in view the prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-5) submitted by the p steps in view of the submissions made therein, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable dispossess the petitioner but he raised hue and raula, which attracted the persons working in the nearby fields and the police jeep passing on the main road, due to which, the private respondents along with other persons ran away In this regard, the petitioner has submitted an application to respondent No.3 but no action was taken. Thereafter, again on 25.02.2025, the private respondents gave beatings to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to (Annexure P-5) submitted by the Notice of motion to official respondents only. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to learned Keeping in view the prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the ) submitted by the petitioner and take appropriate steps in view of the submissions made therein, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.04.21 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment