Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45131 (AP)

S.Veeraraju v. Union of India

WP/37236/2017 · 2025-12-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010872332017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37236 OF 2017 Between: 1. S.Veeraraju, S/o Dorabbai, Age: 35 years, Occ: GDS Packer(Under Put off),R/o Near Water Tank, Peddarayavaram Village,B.O. Rangampet SO, East Godavari Dist. ...Petitioner AND 1. Union of India, Rep by its Secretary Department of Posts, Ministry of Communications & IT, Dak Bhavan, Sanasad Marg, New Delhi-11001 2. The Chief Post Master General, A.P.Circle, Hyderabad 3. The Post Master General, Visakhapatnam Region, Visakhapatnam 4. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Kakinada Division, Kakinada- 533001 5. The Sub Registrar, Peddapuram, East Godavari Dist-533 437 6. The District Registrar, Kakinada, East Godavari District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of 'Mandamus' declaring the action of the 4th respondent 2 in issuing letter No. F3-4/1/12-13 dated 10-02-2016 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to Law and contrary to Articles 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the letter No. F3-4/1/12- 13 dated 10-02-2016 issued by the 4th respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 46263 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the letter No. F34/1/12-13 dated 10-02-2016 issued by the 4 th. respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: D RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.37236 OF 2017 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of 'Mandamus' declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing letter No. F3-4/1/12-13 dated 10-02- 2016 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to Law and contrary to Articles 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the letter No. F3-4/1/12-13 dated 10-02-2016 issued by the 4th respondent and pass …..” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri D.Rama Krishna, who appeared through virtual hearing, submits that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:24.12.2025 Rns 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.37236 of 2017 Date:24.12.2025 Rns