'5. \ ’ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMAR (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 38900 OF 201« Between: N. Sailaja, D/o N. Narsaiah Aged 45 years, Un-employee R/o Flat No 403 E- Venue Apartments Road No. 14, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ...Petitioner AND Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University Lam, Guntur rep. by its Registrar Guntur - 522 034, Guntur District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned Notification / ADVT NO. 7/RC/2018 dated 10/10/2018 of the respondent university as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional to the extent of prescribing upper age limit as 42 years and consequently direct the respondent authority to accept the application filed by the petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor in Agriculture and permit her to appear for the selection process of written examination and interview for selection along with others to that post and to appoint her as Assistant Professor in Agriculture basing on her performance in the selection process and to grant i . ' V 'A lA NO: 1 OF 2018 . '.> Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Notification / ADVT NO. 7/RC/2018 dated 10/10/2018 of the respondent university to the extent of prescribing upper age limit as 42 years and duly directing the respondent authority to accept the application filed by the petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor in Agriculture and permit her to appear for the selection of written examination and interviews for selection along with others to that post and to appoint her as Assistant Professor in Agriculture basing on her performance in the selection process, pending disposal of writ petition process Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VARADA NAGESHWARA RAO (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent: SRI N SRIRAM MURTHY The Court made the following: Order % IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:389QQ OF 2018 Counsel for the Petitioner: I.V.Nageswara Rao Counsel for the Respondent{S|: I.N.Sriram Murthy The Court made the following: ORDER; 1. None represented for the Petitioner. 2. The proceedings sheet dated 28.04.2025 also represented for the Petitioner. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution Pending applications, if any. shall stand closed. shows that none Sd/-SHAIK MOHD RAF! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI VARADA NAGESHWARA RAO 2. One CC to SRI N SRIRAM MURTHY Advocate 3. Three CD Copies Advocate [OPUC] [OPUC] gsg #■ HrGH COURT DATED: 30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.38900 of 2018 5( 2 5 SEP 2025 Co DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS