SHIMLA JAL PRABANDHAN NIGAM LIMITED v. RAKESH AND ORS
CMP.M/1445/2026 · 2026-09-07
Sushil Kukreja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4513 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4513 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Shimla Jal Prabandhan Nigam Ltd. vs. Rakesh and others. RFA No.123 of 2025 07.09.2026 Present: Ms. Ridhima Karol, Advocate vice Mr. Tejasvi Dogra, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 8. Mr.Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 9 to 11.
CMP(M) No.1445 of 2026 Learned counsel for the non-applicant/non- objector, has stated that she doesn’t want to file reply to the present application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay in filing the cross objections, is hereby condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cross Objection No.______ of 2026. Be registered. Admit. List for final hearing along with main appeal in due course.
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 07, 2026 (reena)