Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45127 (CHH)

OMPRAKASH SWADU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/194/2023 · 2025-07-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 194 of 2023 1 - Omprakash Swadu S/o Bhagat Ram Aged About 39 Years Working As Asst. Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Gadapali, Block Kharsia, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Kharsia, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6 - Block Education Officer Kharsia, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeet Patel, Advocate. For Respondent(s) /State : Mr. Vivek Mishra, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 31/07/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records in relates to the case of the petitioners from the possession of respondents for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authority to release the arrears of payment which the petitioner is entitled from the date of his completion of 8 years of service. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/relief's in favour of the petitioners, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner. ” 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat