[2025:RJ-JP:46993] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7911/2005 1. The Managing Committee Mayo College Ajmer through its secretary Shri Pramod Sharma 2. The Principal Mayo College Ajmer ----Petitioners Versus 1. Panchu Lal Maali S/o Shri Durga Ji Maali aged about 53 years R/o Behind Oman House Panchayat House Mayo College Ajmer (Deceased) Now represented by: 1/1 Rekha Devi W/o Late Panchu Lal Maali aged about 65 years R/o Behind Oman House Panchayat House Mayo College Ajmer at present residing at 574 in front of Raja Kothi, Gulab Bari, Ajmer. 1/2 Deepa W/o Kishore Kumar D/o Panchu Lal Maali aged about 38 years R/o Behind Oman House Panchayat House Mayo College Ajmer at present Village Tabiji Tehsil Ajmer. 1/3 Suman W/o Pramod Bharadwaj D/o Panchu lal Maali aged about 43 years R/o Behind Oman House Panchayat House Mayo College Ajmer at present residing at 29/161 Shiv Mandir Gulab Badi Ajmer. 1/4 Dinesh Chouhan S/o Panchu Lal Maali aged about 40 years R/o Behind Oman House Panchayat House Mayo College Ajmer at present residing at 574 in front of Raja Kothi, Gulab Bari, Ajmer 2. The Director of College Secondary Education, Government of Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Chairman Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra 2 Community Centre Preet Vihar Delhi 110092. 4. Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Tribunal Jaipur through its Registrar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Bhargava For Respondent(s) : Mr. D.P. Sharma Adv. Bhavya Kala for Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA [2025:RJ-JP:46993] (2 of 3) [CW-7911/2005] Order 20/11/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Managing Committee Mayo College with a challenge to order dated 14.09.2005, passed by the learned Rajasthan Non- Government Educational Institution Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the learned Tribunal’) in Appeal No.21/2001, whereby the appeal filed by the respondent employee against his termination order, was allowed and the learned Tribunal set aside the order of termination with direction for reinstatement with consequential benefits. 2. An application (IA No.1/2025) has been filed by the applicant for disposal of the writ petition in the light of written compromise in between the parties. The written compromise has also been placed on record along with the application. 3. As per the terms and conditions of the written compromise, the parties have agreed as under:- "Now this compromise agreement witnessed as under:- 1. That it is agreed between the parties that the party of 1st part will pay to the party of 2nd part a lump sum amount of Rs 9.50 lacs as full and final settlement of the case. No other amount of any kind whatsoever will be paid to the party of 2nd part. 2. The party of 2nd part agrees that all the claims of Late Shri Panchu Lal Mali past, present or future stands settled and they will not seek any other benefits after receipt of Rs.9.5 lakhs. 3. The parties agree that after execution of this agreement, withdrawal application will be filed by them before the Hon'ble High Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7911/2005." [2025:RJ-JP:46993] (3 of 3) [CW-7911/2005] 4. Learned counsels for both the parties submit that the parties have signed the written compromise and are agreed to the terms and conditions as stated in the compromise, and, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the terms and conditions of the compromise. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, so also the written compromise in between the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise. Both the parties shall abide by the terms and conditions of the compromise. 6. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /13