CRM-M-58525- IN THE H (297) MANU ALIAS M STATE OF UT C CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. Ms. S MANISHA BATR 1. The p Nagarik Suraksha dated 29.09.2025 Nyaya Sanhita (fo subsequent procee 06.10.2025 (Anne 2. This appear before the Magistrate was d compromise. 3. Pursu learned Judicial M -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CRM Date o IAS MONU ALIAS KAKA AND AN Versus
UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Sunil Kaushik, Advocate for the p Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, APP, UT, Cha Ms. Sandeep Kaur, Advocate for resp ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been filed u raksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) f .2025 registered under Sections 11 ita (for short “BNS”) at Police Statio proceedings emanating therefrom on t (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 16.10.20 re the trial Court to get their stateme was directed to send his report q Pursuant to the aforesaid order, part icial Magistrate First Class, Chandig JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
RM-M-58525-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 28.01.2026 ND ANOTHER ... Petitioners OTHER ...Respondents ANISHA BATRA
or the petitioners , Chandigarh respondent No.2 filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya SS”) for quashing of FIR No.0201 115(2), 333, 3(5) of Bharatiya Station Sector 36, Chandigarh and m on the basis of compromise dated .2025 had directed the parties to statements recorded and the learned port qua the genuineness of the r, parties have appeared before the handigarh and got their statements s
s
atiya 0201 atiya and ated es to rned the e the ents AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-58525- recorded. On the submitted report d effected between influence. 4. Learn not disputed the fa 5. In vi continue with the p 6. Follo this Court in Kulw 2007 (3) RCR (Cr Gian Singh Versu is allowed and qu Sections 115(2), 3 Police Station Se therefrom on the quashed qua the pe 28.01.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 2 n the basis of the statements so reco eport dated 01.12.2025 to the effect t en the parties voluntarily and wi Learned State counsel as well as cou the factum of compromise between th In view of the above, no useful th the proceedings before the trial Cou Following the principles laid down b Kulwinder Singh and others Versus (Criminal) 1052 and approved by ersus State of Punjab and others (2 and quashing of FIR No.0201 dated 5(2), 333, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya on Sector 36, Chandigarh and subse n the basis of compromise dated 06 the petitioners. (MAN Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/ Whether reportable : Yes/No so recorded, learned Magistrate has ffect that the compromise has been nd without any coercion or undue as counsel for respondent No.2 has een the parties. seful purpose would be served to al Court in the instant FIR. own by the Full Bench judgment of ersus State of Punjab and another ed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in rs (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition dated 29.09.2025 registered under yaya Sanhita (for short “BNS”) at subsequent proceedings emanating ted 06.10.2025 (Annexure P-2) are (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE : Yes/No has been ndue has d to nt of her rt in tition nder ) at ating are AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.