Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040006562025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/191/2025 M/s S N Enterprises a proprietorship firm having its registered office at Old Market Tawang, PO and District Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh 790104 represented by its proprietor Shri Sangey Norbu, Son of Shri Nawang Dondup, resident of Lumla, Tawang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 8 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer PWD Age: 0 Occupation : Western Zone Mowb-II Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PWD Chayang Tajo Division East Kameng District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Superintending Engineer PWD Age: 0 Occupation : Sagalee Circle Bobia Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 2/3 5:The Tender Opening Committee Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its Chairman Office of the Executive Engineer Chayang Tajo Division PWD East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Officer in charge Age: 0 Occupation : Itanagar Police Station Bank Tinali Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:The Officer in Charge Age: 0 Occupation : Seppa Police Station East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 8:M/s Good Will Suppliers Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Nguri Rajen G Sector Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh 791111 9:M/s Samco Construction Co Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Tage Sambio Son of Late Tage Tailyang Tajang (Lempia) Village PO and PS Ziro Lower Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Bedanta Kaushik, Pankaj Borah,Takar Bagang Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Anil Rebe Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 21.05.2025 Heard Shri T Bagang, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri S Tapin, learned Sr. Govt. Advocate, AP for the official respondents as well as Shri A Rebe, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 8 and 9. Shri Bagang, learned counsel for the petitioner has, however submitted that he has instructions not press this writ petition. The aforesaid submission is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant