Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45113 (PNJ)

RANDHIR SINGH v. NAVNEET JAIN AND OTHERS

CR/2338/2025 · 2025-04-28

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 130 Randhir Singh Navneet Jain and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) order dated 24.12.2024 (Annexure P (Jr. Divn.), Malerkotla in CS/832/2021 titled as “Navneet Jain vs. Charan Singh and others” whereby the application filed by the peti No.2 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed. convinced with the submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present pe learned trial Court. April 28, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2338 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision : Randhir Singh Versus Navneet Jain and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Gagandeep Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate with Mr. Shubham, Advocate for the respondents. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition is for quashing/setting aside the order dated 24.12.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Malerkotla in CS/832/2021 titled as “Navneet Jain vs. Charan Singh and others” whereby the application filed by the peti No.2 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not convinced with the submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to take these pleas before the learned trial Court. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2338 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-28.04.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Gagandeep Singh Virk, Advocate Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate with Mr. Shubham, Advocate for the respondents. present petition is for quashing/setting aside the 5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Malerkotla in CS/832/2021 titled as “Navneet Jain vs. Charan Singh and others” whereby the application filed by the petitioner/defendant No.2 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint has been After arguing for some time, when this Court was not convinced with the submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for tition with liberty to take these pleas before the Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.30 18.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document