Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45113 (CHH)

SMT. DHANESHWARI SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/8563/2024 · 2025-01-17

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:3258 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8563 of 2024 1 - Smt. Dhaneshwari Singh W/o Jawahir Singh @ Jawahirlal, Aged About 24 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village-Shivprasadnagar, Out Post- Basdei, P.S.-Surajpur, Tahsil-Bhaiyathan, District-Surajpur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O., Out Post Basdei, P.S.-Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Karan Bahrani, Panel lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 17/01/2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of BNS, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 516/2024, registered at 2 Police Station Surajpur (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. The prosecution story in brief is that on 27.08.2024 in the afternoon at about 4 o’clock deceased Indrapal Singh has altercating with his elder brother Jawahir Singh thereafter jawahir Singh and applicant who is wife of Jawahir Singh together assaulted Indrapal Singh by hand and fist an front of the house and also strangulated to death thereafter deceased died and thereafter the deceased died and therefore the offence under Section 103(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 has been registered against the applicant. 3. It was argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is in jail since 13.09.2024. Also, the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and contended that the applicant is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of the offence, material available in the case dairy this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to enlarge the 3 applicant on regular bail. Accordingly, the bail application of applicant- Dhaneshwari Singh involved in Crime No. Crime No. 516/2024, registered at Police Station Surajpur (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 is rejected. 7. However, this Court hopes and trusts that the Trial Court shall make earnest endeavour to conclude the trial expeditiously as soon as possible in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima