- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3738-DB RFA No. 100333 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100333 OF 2020 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAXMIBAI W/O. SHANKAREPPA ZALAKKI AGE: 78 YEARS, R/AT: TUNGAL VILLAGE, TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT -587330. 2. SRI. RAMESH S/O. SHANKERAPPA ZALAKKI AGE: 50 YEARS, R/AT: TUNGAL VILLAGE, TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT -587330. SINCE HE IS DUMB REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1. 3. SRI. MALLAPPA S/O. SHANKERAPPA ZALAKKI AGE: 48 YEARS, R/AT: TUNGAL VILLAGE, TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT -587330. 4. SMT. MAHANANDA W/O. SHARANAPPA TUNGAL AGE: 43 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT: #13-1134, SHARAN NAGAR, SHAHABAD MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Date: 2025.03.01 11:09:23 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3738-DB RFA No. 100333 of 2020 CHITTAPUR TALUK, GULBARGA-585228. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. NABIRASOOL MAMADAPUR, ADV APPEARED THROUGH VC) AND: SMT. GANGAWWA W/O. SHANKREPPA PUJARI AGE: 53 YEARS, R/AT. KOLUR VILLAGE, BILAGI TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT-587301 SINCE SHE IS DUMB REPRESENTED BY HER HUSBAND SRI. SHANKREPPA S/O. SHANMUKAPPA PUJARI R/AT. KOLUR VILLAGE, BILAGI TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT-587301. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN C. HUKKERI, ADV) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD.08.05.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.37/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JAMKHANDI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3738-DB RFA No. 100333 of 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) 1. Learned counsel for the appellants appearing through video conference submits that the parties have settled the matter and a memo along with a copy of the Afsat Vatani Patra executed between the parties to the suit is produced. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. As the parties have settled the matter out of the Court, nothing survives for consideration in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE kmv CT: BSB