Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45101 (AP)

BODDEDA VENKATA NARASIMHAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/32864/2025 · 2025-12-23

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010618072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 32864/2025 Between: 1. BODDEDA VENKATA NARASIMHAM, S/O. LATE JAGGARAO, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.5-31, NAGULAPALLIL VILLAGE, MUNAGAPAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. BODDEDA JAGADISH,, S/O. BODDEDA VENKATA NARASIMHAM, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.5-31, NAGULAPALLIL VILLAGE, MUNAGAPAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. BODDEDA TARUN MANOJ,, S/O. BODDEDA VENKATA NARASIMHAM, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.7-46/9/3, FLAT NO. 104, CHINNA BAZAR SLIVER OAX SCHOOL, RUSHIKONDA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (LAND ACQUISITION), A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, ANAKAPALLY DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANAKAPALLYDIVISION, ANAKAPALLY DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MUNGAPAKAMANDAL, ANAKAPALLY DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring theaction of the respondents is not permitting to withdraw the amount under the award Ref. G /89/2020, dt- 28.04.2025 under the proceedings dt-21.11.2024 and dt-04.02.2025, inspite of the even letter dt.20.10.2023 made by the petitioner seeking to permit to withdraw an award amount passed by the authorities under protest and 2nd respondent insisting to file consent award as full and final settlementas illegal, arbitrary, against Provisions of Act 13 of 2013 in violation of Article 14 and 21 and 300A constitution and principal of natural justice and against all settle principles of law consequently, direct the respondents to release the amount to the petitioners under award into their bank account No.43993773425, IFSC code. SBIN0016350, Yendada branch and to permit the petitioners for avail Remedy for higher compensation and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondents to release the amount to the petitioners under award into their bank account No.43993773425, IFSC code. SBIN0016350, Yendada branch and to permit the petitioners for avail Remedy for higher compensation and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION No:32864 /2025 ORDER: 1. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file a fresh writ petition. No costs. 4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Date:24.12.2025 BV