[2025:RJ-JP:43498-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1266/2025 1. Priti Bala D/o Surendra Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 254, Vikas Nager Near By R.b.m. Hospital District Bharatpur, Rajasthan-321001. 2. Sunita Kumari D/o Rohitasw Kumar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan-333026. 3. Bhanupriya Dagdi D/o Sukhdev Dagdi, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Post Kharwa, Tehsil Masuda, District Ajmer, Rajasthan-305202. 4. Sarita Sukhwal D/o Ramesh Chandra Menaria, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Sawa Dsitrict Chittorgarh, Rajasthan- 312613. ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, Secretariate, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Primises, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302018 ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Nitin Pareek, Adv. for Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 30/10/2025 1. The issue raised in the present petition stands already adjudicated by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Vijay Kumar Choudhary & Anr. Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board & [2025:RJ-JP:43498-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1266/2025] Ors.: D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 960/2025 and other connected appeals, wherein this Court held as under:- “The contention raised that in case inbuilt capacitor as is used in MOS Transistor was to be considered the term MOSFET should have been used in the question, is in fact a grievance that the question could have been phrased accurately. The contention does not fall within the scope of judicial scrutiny in writ jurisdiction of the correctness of the answer key. The expert committee having examined the answer key and arrived at a reasoned conclusion leaves no scope for interference by this Court in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Given the well-settled principles governing judicial review of answer keys in public examinations, the learned Single Judge was justified in declining to interfere with the findings of the expert committee more so, in absence of challenge to the material relied by the expert committee. No case is made out for interference in the intra court appeals, the same are dismissed.” 2. Keeping in view the above, the present Special Appeal Writ is dismissed, mutatis mutandis. 3. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ HEENA/Diksha-13