Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45095 (AP)

V. Babu, C-942990, APSRTC Driver, v. The A.P.S.R.T.C.,

WP/19686/2014 · 2025-04-24

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF Af| TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE: PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19686 OF 2014 Between: V. Babu, C-942990, APSRTC Driver, S/o. Kama! Saheb, 39 yrs, Rajampet Depot, Rio. Rajampet, Kadapa Dist. ...Petitioner AND 1. The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2. The Regional Manager, A.P.SrR.T.C., Kadapa, Region, at Kadapa, Kadapa Dist. 3. The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Kadapa, Kadapa Dist. 4. The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Rajampet, Kadapa Dist ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3'^'^ respondent in terminating the services of the petitioner vide Proc. No; 0l/2(7)12011-KDP, dt.31-10-2011.' respondent by ordering reinstatement as a Fresh Driver by denying past service and benefits to the petitioner vide Proc. No: PA/19A(19)/12-RM/K, Dt 28-6-2012 as high handed and arbitrary action, contrary to APSRTC Regulations, contrary to the circular instructions and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice with a consequential direction to the nd which was modified by the 2 respondents to extend all the benefits on par with the colleagues of the' petitioner including regularization and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. LA. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 24643 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the respondents herein to regularize the services of the petitioner on par with his colleagues forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondents: ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) The Court made the following: r APHC010067012014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3330] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19686/2014 Between: V. Babu ...PETITIONER AND The A P S R T C and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent{S): I.ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following: 1 Y 2 the honourable SRI JUSTICE wrupetition no tarlada rajasekhar rao‘ of 2014 ORDER: Learned counsel for the for withdrawal of this 17.04.2025 to that effect. petitioner seeks writ petition and addressed permission of this Court a letter, dated Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition shall be no order as to costs. is dismissed as withdrawn. There As a sequel thereto shall stand closed. miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, cd/. A. VENU GOPAL RAO assistant i|^gjst^R SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to SRI. S M SUBHAN Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies. Ksr HIGH COURT \ DATED;25/04/2025 ORDER a 2 5 SEP 2025 1 ntSectio” Ii WP.No.19686 of 2014 5>» DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS