ROLI AGARWAL W/O SHRI AYUSH MITTAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/9115/2022 · 2025-11-26
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45093 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45093 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48083] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 9115/2022 Roli Agarwal W/o Shri Ayush Mittal, Aged About 30 Years, Currently Residing At F-55, Mahesh Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan.
3. Station House Officer, Police Station Ashok Nagar, Jaipur.
4. Ayush Mittal S/o Shri Navneet Mittal, R/o 302 Vinayak Apartment, D-15, Mira Marg, Banipark, Jaipur.
5. Archana Mittal W/o Shri Navneet Mittal, R/o 302 Vinayak Apartment, D-15, Mira Marg, Banipark, Jaipur.
6. Shreya Agarwal W/o Shri Ark Dalmiy, R/o 302 Kamal Apartment, Station Road, Kabir Marg, Banipark, Jaipur.
7. Ark Dalmiya, R/o 302 Kamal Apartment, Station Road, Kabir Marg, Banipark, Jaipur.
8. Rajeev Mittal, R/o Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur.
9. Sunil Mittal, R/o Vishwakarma, Sikar Road, Jaipur.
10. Anil Agarwal S/o Shri Vishweshar Das Agarwal, R/o 301, Aashirvad Residency, Vijay Nagar, Agra Road, Jaipur.
11. Manu Agarwal S/o Shri Anil Agarwal, R/o 301, Aashirvad Residency, Vijay Nagar, Agra Road, Jaipur.
12. Pushpa S/o Shri Anil Agarwal, R/o 301, Aashirvad Residency, Vijay Nagar, Agra Road, Jaipur.
13. Ranjan, R/o 304, Aparna Garden, Vijay Nagar, Agra Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP
[2025:RJ-JP:48083] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-9115/2022] JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/11/2025
1. This petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioner to cure the defect(s).
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter and she has lost interest in pursuing this matter.
3. In view of the above, the instant criminal misc. petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
4. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/290