[2025:RJ-JP:47829] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1351/2025 1. Garima Saini D/o Shri Chote Lal Saini, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Village Pilwa, Tehil Saithal, District Dausa (Rajasthan) At Present Resident Of Tapri Gujran, Tehsil Malarana Dungar, Police Station Malarana Dungar District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 2. Ganesh Saini S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Saini, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Tapri Gujran, Tehsil Malarana Dungar, Police Station Malarana Dungar District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Dausa (Rajasthan) 3. S.H.O. Police Station Kotwali Dausa, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 4. Chote Lal Saini S/o Shri Kajod Saini, Resident Of Village Pilwa, Tehil Saithal, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 5. Sitaram Saini S/o Shri Chote Lal Saini, Resident Of Village Pilwa, Tehil Saithal, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 6. Ashok Saini S/o Shri Chote Lal Saini, Resident Of Village Pilwa, Tehil Saithal, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 7. Chameli Devi W/o Shri Chote Lal Saini, Resident Of Village Pilwa, Tehil Saithal, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 8. Mukesh Saini S/o Shri Doduram, Resident Of Dularav Tiwari Ki Dhani, Bassi, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 9. Ramesh Saini S/o Shri Bhonri Lal Saini, Resident Of Bagrota, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 10. Uemila Devi W/o Shri Ramesh Saini, Resident Of Bagrota, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. G.K. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Devi Singh, PP [2025:RJ-JP:47829] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1351/2025] JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/11/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Office stands waived. 2. The petitoners have preferred this petition for issuance of necessary directions to the official-respondents to provide adequate security and protection to them on the ground that they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s). 3. It appears that prior to approaching this Court the petitioners have already submitted representations before the concerned Station House Officer/Nodal Officer pursuant to the orders passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Suman Meena vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.792/2024). 4. It is well settled legal position as expounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Lata Singh Vs. State of UP, reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, S. Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal, reported in (2010) 5 SCC 600, Indra Sarma Vs. VKV Sarma reported in (2013) 15 SCC 755 and Shafin Jahan Vs. Asokan KM reported in (2018) 16 SCC 368 that the life and personal liberty of the individuals has to be protected except according to procedure established by law, as mandated by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 5. Looking to the fact that the petitioners have already submitted appropriate representation/application seeking protection before the Nodal Officer as well as concerned Station House Officer, it is expected from the officers concerned to look [2025:RJ-JP:47829] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1351/2025] into the matter in terms of the directions issued by this Court in the case of Suman Meena (supra) and ensure that after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners. 6. It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceeding initiated against the parties. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/323