[2025:RJ-JP:49763] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18945/2025 Nathi Devi W/o Ramkishore, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Babaji Mode, Goner Road, Jaipur (Currently Working As A Cook At The Government Ambedhkar Hostel, Jagatpura, Kota) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Near 22 Godam Bridge, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and: A. By an appropriate, writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to regularized services of Petitioner on the post of Class-IV Servant/respondent be directed to decide the Petitioner representation on Merit as early as possible.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 29.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ [2025:RJ-JP:49763] (2 of 3) [CW-18945/2025] Petition No.8332/2002 titled as Nawal Kishore Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (Civil Appeal No.8558/2018 decided on 19.08.2025), by Hon’ble Supreme Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Nawal Kishore Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and Dharam Singh (supra), if application upon facts of the case. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra), followed by this Court in case of Nawal Kishore (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:49763] (3 of 3) [CW-18945/2025] 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /42