Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45083 (KAR)

M/S KIRLOSKAR ELECTRIC COMPANY LTD., v. SMT. DEEPA CHOLAN

CCC/100345/2024 · 2025-03-04

C M Poonacha, S G Pandit

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4200-DB CCC No. 100345 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100345 OF 2024 BETWEEN: M/S. KIRLOSKAR ELECTRIC COMPANY LTD., PB NO.112, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI-580030, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. ANAND B. HUNNUR. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI ARAVIND D.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE.) AND: 1. SMT. DEEPA CHOLAN, AGE: MAJOR, WIFE OF SRI SATHISH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-500 001. … ACCUSED 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-500 001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI GANGADHAR J.M., ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL AND; SRI MADANMOHAN M. KHANNUR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE, FOR R2 (A2); R1 – NOTICE IS SERVED.) THIS CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE APPROPRIATE ORDERS HOLDING THAT THE ACCUSED ARE GUILTY OF GROSS CONTEMPT OF THE ORDERS OF THIS COURT DATED Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4200-DB CCC No. 100345 of 2024 04.09.2024 PASSED IN W.P.NO.103465/2023 (GM-RES) (ANNEXURE- A1), PUNISH THEM AND FURTHER DIRECT THE ACCUSED TO PASS NECESSARY ORDERS APPROVING CHANGE OF LAND USE FROM INDUSTRIAL TO RESIDENTIAL USE IN RESPECT OF THE LANDS BEARING SY.NO.88/B, 88P/1 AND 89 OF RAYANALA VILLAGE IN TERMS OF THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS AS ARE JUST. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER IS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Heard learned counsel Sri Aravind D. Kulkarni for complainant and Additional Advocate General Sri Gangadhar J.M., for respondent State. 2. Learned counsel for the complainant Sri Aravind D. Kulkarni would submit that in pursuance to the direction issued by order dated 04.09.2024, in W.P.No.103465/2023, the respondent issued endorsement dated 18.12.2024, Annexure-R.1, which is the subject matter of Writ Petition No.100475/2025. Therefore we are of the view that contempt petition would no more survive for consideration. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are closed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4200-DB CCC No. 100345 of 2024 3. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of as they do not survive for consideration. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE MRK CT: UMD. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32