Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45081 (RAJ)

JALDHARI S/O SHRI BHARTU @ BHARATLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4991/2025 · 2025-11-21

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47121] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4991/2025 1. Jaldhari S/o Shri Bhartu @ Bharatlal, R/o Panwarpura Tan Hadouti, Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj.). 2. Muniram S/o Shri Mithya, R/o Panwarpura Tan Hadouti, Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj.). ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Utkarsh Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 77/2025 registered at Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide an interim order dated 25.09.2025, it was directed to the applicant to join investigation. It is submitted that in compliance of the directions encapsulated in the order dated 25.09.2025, the applicant has duly joined the investigation and the said interim was continued thereafter. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the bail application; however, he has not disputed the fact that the applicant has joined the investigation. [2025:RJ-JP:47121] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4991/2025] 4. Having heard the contentions put-forth by the counsel representing the parties and considering the fact that the applicant has duly joined the investigation in compliance of the order dated 25.09.2025, and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 25.09.2025 absolute and the same shall be treated as part and parcel and allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli in F.I.R. No. 77/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants Jaldhari S/o Shri Bhartu @ Bharatlal and Muniram S/o Shri Mithya, they shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /197