APHC010353942018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 16552/2018 Between: 1. SRI BELLAPU RAMIREDDY,, S/O. LATE RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 0CC SECRETARY, YATHALURU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., R/O. PELLURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, NELLORE, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, GUDUR, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. YATHALURU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, YATHALURU VILLAGE, VENKATAGIRI MANDAL, S.P.S. NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proceedings R.C. No. 784/2018/C, dated 21.04.2018 passed by the 3rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, violative of principles of natural justice and Fundamental Rights of the Petitioner as guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to Section 115 (D) (2) (iv) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Memo No. 5825/Coop.III/2014-7, dated 23.05.2015 and consequently holding that the Petitioner is entitled to be continued in service till the age of 60 years as per the Resolution of the Managing Committee of the 5th Respondent Society dated 30.03.2018, by setting aside the Proceedings R.C. No. 784/2018/C, dated 21.04.2018 passed by the 3rd Respondent, in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to retain and continue the Petitioner in service till the age of 60 years as per the Resolution of the Managing Committee of the 5th Respondent Society dated 30.03.2018, by suspending the operation of the Proceedings R.C. No. 784/2018/C, dated 21.04.2018 passed by the 3rd Respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in IA No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.16552 of 2018, dated.01.05.2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SYED ARIF BASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.16552 of 2018 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction holding that the petitioner is entitled to be continued in service till the age of 60 years, in terms of the resolution of the Managing Committee of the 5th respondent Society dated 30.03.2018, by setting aside the proceedings in R.C. No.784/2018/C dated 21.04.2018 passed by the 3rd respondent. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption “For Dismissal.” Even on the earlier occasion, there was no representation for the petitioner. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous, since the petitioner has already completed sixty (60) years of age, being the age of superannuation. 4. The submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader are placed on record. 5. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 24th December, 2025 cbn 69 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 16552 of 2018 24th December, 2025 cbn