1 2025:CGHC:50417 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7959 of 2025 1 - Ravi Tondey S/o Sushil Tondey Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Dunda Police Station, Mujgahan, District Raipur C.G. ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S H O Police Station Tikrapara, District Raipur C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Kishan Kumar Yadav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Ms. Pragya Shrivastava, Deputy G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 09/10/2025 1. This is the second bail application of the applicant, who has been arrested on 24.04.2024 in connection with Crime No. 319 of 2024, registered at Police Station Tikrapara, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence under Sections 294, 506, 323, 34 and 302 of IPC. The first bail application of the applicant was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 02.04.2025, passed in MCRC No. 2080 of 2025. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that, all the witnesses have turned hostile and not supported the prosecution’s case. The VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.10.09 19:13:26 +0530 2 applicant is in jail since 24.04.2024, final adjudication of the trial will take its own time, there are material omissions and contradictions in the evidence of the witnesses. Therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes and has submitted that, out of 20 witnesses, 13 witnesses have already been examined and trial of the case is at advance stage, the first bail application of the applicant was dismissed on merits and there is no chance of circumstances in the case. Therefore, he is not entitled for bail. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material annexed with the bail application. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, considering that the first bail application of the applicant was dismissed on merits vide order dated 02.04.2025, the trial of the case is at its advance stage and 13 witnesses out of total 20 witnesses have already been examined, I am not inclined to admit this second bail application of the applicant. 6. Accordingly, the present second bail application of the applicant is dismissed at the motion stage. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved