Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45071 (MAD)

M.RAJAGOPAL v. THE ADMINISTRATOR

WP/13944/2019 · 2025-04-15

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P. No. 13944 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.04.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA W.P. No. 13944 of 2019 M.Rajagopal … Petitioner -vs- 1. The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme Trust, Thiruvalluvar House Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600002. 2. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636007. 3. The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636007. 4. The Assistant Manager (Provident Fund) Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636007. ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected with the proceedings dated 11.09.2018 of the fourth respondent passed in Letter No.12/PEN/TNSTC(Salem)/2018, quash the same 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 13944 of 2019 and consequentially direct the respondents to refix and enhance the pension payable to the petitioner on par with his similarly placed colleagues who joined and retired from services along with him. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Girija For Respondents : Mr.M.Aswin, Standing Counsel O R D E R This writ petition has been filed to call for the records connected to the proceedings dated 11.09.2018 of the fourth respondent passed in Letter No.12/PEN/TNSTC(Salem)/2018, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to refix and enhance the pension payable to the petitioner on par with his similarly placed colleagues who joined and retired from services along with him. 2. Heard Ms.S.Girija, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Aswin, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has retired from service on 31.05.2018. It is submitted by the petitioner that some 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 13944 of 2019 unexplained deductions have been made in the terminal benefits payable to the petitioner and his pension has also been not fixed properly. 4. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that the calculations have been rightly made, but the petitioner compares himself with persons equal to his position and claims similar benefits. 5. It is further submitted that the deduction of Rs.53,500/- was made in terms of the settlement arrived under 12(3) on 04.01.2017. 6. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above amount had already been remitted by the petitioner and once again it has been deducted from the gratuity amount payable to the petitioner. 7. It is further submitted that the petitioner was given with certain punishments and later, it was modified and the same was not taken into account while calculating the terminal benefits including the pension of the petitioner. 8. It appears from the records that the petitioner has chosen to challenge only the RTI information given and not any proceedings passed after 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 13944 of 2019 considering the petitioner’s representation. 9. In view of the same, I feel it is appropriate to dispose the writ petition by giving liberty to the petitioner to give fresh representation to the third respondent. 10. In the result, this writ petition is disposed by granting liberty to the petitioner to give a fresh representation to the third respondent. The third respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass orders on merits within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the third respondent finds that the petitioner is entitled for better retirement benefits and enhanced pension, it will be obligatory on his part to forward the said proposal to the first respondent to act upon it. No costs. 15.04.2025 Internet: Yes/No Speaking /Non-speaking order Neutral Case Citation : Yes / No Maya To 1. The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 13944 of 2019 Employees Post Retirement Welfare Fund Scheme Trust, Thiruvalluvar House Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600002. 2. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636007. 3. The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636007. 4. The Assistant Manager (Provident Fund) Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd. 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-636007. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 13944 of 2019 R.N.MANJULA, J. Maya W.P. No. 13944 of 2019 Dated : 15.04.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis