APHC010504232015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 860/2015 Between: 1. G. VENKATESWARA RAO S/O KOTESWARA RAO HINDU,, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO 12-17-18, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THIRUPURAM SAMRAJYAM W/O VISHWANATHAM,, AGED 50 YEARS, RIO NELAKANTA VILLAGE, VETAPALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT , CRIME AND INVESTIGATION WING 2ND FLOOR, PARYAVARAN BHAVAN, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI. 3. KAPIL CHIT FUNDS PRIVATE LIMITED REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN, D.NO. 3-1-631, CAPT VIJAYA RAGHUNANDAN NAGAR, KARIMNAGAR, KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT. 4. KAPIL CHITS KOSTA PRIVATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, D.NO.40-14-3/1, CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 JS,J W.P.No.860/2015 5. KAPIL INFRA AVENUES PVT LTD, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 3-1-188, CVRN NAGAR, KARIMNAGAR, KARIMNAGR DISTRICT. 6. KAPIL FOODS STRUCTURES PVT LTD REP BY ITS, MANAGING DIRECTOR/CHIEF EXECUTIVE, H.NO. 2-5-760, SUBEDARI, OPP.DIST. COLLECTOR OFFICE, HANAMAKONDA, WARANGAL DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. 7. RAMYA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD REP BY ITS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO.40-14-3/L, CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. M/S SHILPA AGRO FARMS DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 3-6-9/10, 1ST FLOOR, ABOVE CORPORATION BANK, VIVEKANANDA COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD. TELANGANA STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in failing to take action pursuant to the Registration of Case No. SFIO/COMP- 18/2012/2673 dated 22-5-2013 as referred to in column No. 6 regarding the petitioners pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 10-4-2013 submitted Under Section 212 of Indian Companies Act, against the respondents 3 to 8 without any action is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to section 212 of the Indian Companies Act and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith take further action pursuant to the Registration of Case No. SFIO/COMP18/2012/2673 dated 22-5-2013 as referred to in column No. 6 regarding the petitioners pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 10-4-2013 submitted Under Section 212 of Indian Companies Act, and to take up thc investigation under Serious fraud investigation Agency against the respondents 3 to 8 for the illegalities committed by them under Indian Companies Act as also on the basis of the proceedings of the Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District in C.No. 116/D6-DCR8/2012 dated 27-12-2012 and pass 3 JS,J W.P.No.860/2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 1055 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith take further action pursuant to the Registration of Case No. SFIO/COMP-18/2012/2673 dated 22-5-2013 as referred to in column No. 6 regarding the petitioners pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 104-2013 submitted Under Section 212 of Indian Companies Act, and to take up the investigation under Serious fraud investigation Agency against the respondents 3 to 8 for the illegalities committed by them under Indian Companies Act as also on the basis of the proceedings of the Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District in C.No. 116/D6- DCRB/2012 dated 27-12-2012 pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO 4 JS,J W.P.No.860/2015 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri M. Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, appeared through online and submitted that no further orders are required in this writ petition. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS 5 JS,J W.P.No.860/2015 242 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 860/2015 Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS