Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45066 (RAJ)

HAREY KRISHNA CONDUCTORS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/17772/2025 · 2025-11-27

Sandeep Taneja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48184] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17772/2025 Harey Krishna Conductors Private Limited, A Private Limited Company Incorporated Under The Provision Of The Companies Act, 1956, And Inter Alia, Carrying On Business From Registered Address At B-44, Jhilmil Tahirpur Industrial Area, G.t. Road, Shahdara, New Delhi 110095 Through Mr. Prashant Bajpai S/o Chandra Mohan Bajpai, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 101, D-80, Sidharth Nagar, Jaipur-302017 Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Ministry Of Railways, Having Its Office At Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi-110001. 2. General Manager, North Western Railways, Having Its Office At Head Quarter Office, 3Rd Floor, Near Jawahar Circle, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur - 302017. 3. Controller Of Stores, North Western Railways, Having His Office At Head Quarter, 3Rd Floor, Near Jawahar Circle, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur - 302017. 4. Principal Chief Material Manager, North Western Railways, Having His Office At Head Quarter, 3Rd Floor, Near Jawahar Circle, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur - 302017. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Vyas, Sr. Advocate-cum- ASG assisted by Mr. C.S. Sinha Mr. Avtansh Bana & Mr. Dev Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 27/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition with liberty to file representation before the respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:48184] (2 of 2) [CW-17772/2025] 2. Mr. Bharat Vyas, learned Senior Counsel-cum-Additional Solicitor General appears on behalf of respondents and submits that if, the representation is filed within a period of ‘10 days’ from the receipt of a certified copy of this order, the same shall be decided by the respondents-authority concerned within a period of ‘one month’ thereafter, strictly in accordance with law. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed, with liberty as prayed for. 4. All pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /32