[2025:RJ-JP:48911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13615/2025 1. Harisingh S/o Shri Pukhram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ganeshganj, P.s Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur (Rajasthan) (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Tonk) 2. Lokesh S/o Shri Satyanarayan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nayagaon, P.s. Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Tonk) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Lakhan Singh Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/12/2025 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.95/2025 registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk for offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 140(3), 110, 61(2) of of BNS-2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in these cases. He further submit that no grievous injury has been caused on any vital part [2025:RJ-JP:48911] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13615/2025] of the body of injured Sagar. He argued that co-accused Mankesh and Omprakash have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 10.10.2025. Though there are eight cases against petitioner Harisingh and six cases against petitioner Lokesh as previous antecedents but in those cases petitioners have been released on bail. He again argued that petitioners are behind the bars since 26.07.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Harisingh S/o Shri Pukhram and Lokesh S/o Shri Satyanarayan be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- [2025:RJ-JP:48911] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13615/2025] (i) that the petitioners shall mark their presence before the SHO, Police Station Banetha, District Tonk in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioners fails to mark their presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioners shall not repeat any offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /3