IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23172 OF 2023 Between: Peddireddy Surya Prakash Reddy, S/o Venkata Krishna Reddy, Aged 44 Years, Hindu, R/o D.No.7-338/5/5, 0pp. Indane Gas Company, Mangamur Donka, Ongole City,Prakasam District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government,Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi,Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent Of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. Station House Officer, Ongole Taluk P.S., Ongole, Prakasam District. 4. Sub-Inpsector of Police, Taluk P.S.,Ongole, Prakasam District. 5. Tahsildar, Ongole Mandal,Ongole, Prakasam District. 6. Ongole Muncipal Corporation, Rep. by its Muncipal Commissioner,Ongole, Prakasam District. 7. Neelam Nagendra, S/o Papaiah.Aged about 55 Years, Hindu, R/o Neelampalem, Ongole,Prakasam District. 8. Vemuri Malyadri, S/o Narasimha Rao, Aged about 47 years, Hindu, Land broker, R/o 0pp. Vijaya Raghava Rao Hospital, 60 Feet Road, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...Respondents under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more Petition particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly respondents 3 to 6 at the instance of respondents 7 to 8 in interfering with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of landed property of Ac. 1.04 Cents covered by S.No. 148/2 of Pernamitta Revenue Village of Ongole Mandal in Prakasam District and insisting me to vacate therefrom, as illegal, irregular, irrational and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 6 not to interfere in any manner with my personal life and liberty nor insist me to vacate there from. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner personal life and liberty nor insist him to vacate from the petitioner landed property of Ac. 1.04 Cents covered by S.No. 148/2 of Pernamitta Revenue Village of Ongole Mandal in Prakasam District. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. BODAPATI VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME GP FOR REVENUE Sri M.Manohar Reddy, Standing Counsel The Court made the following: APHC010448882023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23172/2023 Between; Peddireddy Surya Prakash Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.BODAPATI VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23172/2023 ORDER: 1. Aggrieved by the action of 4*^ respondent in trying to interfere with the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.7 and 8. At the behest of respondents 7 and 8, the 4*'^ erspondent is pressurizing to settle the disputes relating to the property admeasuring Ac. 1.04 cents in RS.No. 148/2 of Pernamitta revenue Village of Ongole Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 7‘^ respondent has filed a complaint against the petitioner, which was registered a case in Crime No.265 of 2021 of Ongole Taluka Police Station, Prakasam District for the alleged offence under Sections 143, 147, 341,323 of IPC and Section 5 of AP Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act and Section 3(1 )(f), 3(1 )(r), 3(1 )(s), 3(2)(va) of SC, ST.(POA) Act. It is also submitted that the petitioner has also filed CRLP.No.2774 of 2021 and this Court directed the investigating officer to proceed with the investigation and on filing of the charge sheet. The quash petition was disposed by granting liberty to challenge the same if so advised. However, under the guise of investigation in Crime No.265 of 2021, the 4*'' respondent is trying to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents 7 and 8. 3. Considering the same, there shall be a direction to the 4^^ respondent not to interfere with the disputes pending between petitioner and the respondents 7 and 8. This order would not preclude the concerned investigating officer in filing the charge sheet/final report. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off without costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI^^OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government,Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi,Amaravati, Guntur District. The Superintendent Of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. Station House Officer, Ongole Taluk P.S., Ongole, Prakasam District. Sub-Inpsector of Police, Taluk P.S.,Ongole, Prakasam District. Tahsildar, Ongole Mandal,Ongole, Prakasam District. The Muncipal Commissioner, Ongole Muncipal Corporation, Ongole, Prakasam District. Neelam Nagendra, S/o Papaiah.Aged about 55 Years, Hindu, R/o Neelampalem, Ongole,Prakasam District. 8. Vemuri Malyadri, S/o Narasimha Rao, Aged about 47 years, Hindu, Land broker, R/o 0pp. Vijaya Raghava Rao Hospital, 60 Feet Road, Ongole, Prakasam District.( 1 to 8 by RPAD) 9. One CC to SRI. BODAPATI VAMSI KRISHNA Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri M.Manohar Reddy, Standing Counsel [OPUC] / Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 10. 11. 12. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT] Three CD Copies 13. ksr h HIGH COURT DATED:16/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.23172 of 2023 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS