SADHAN KUMAR DEY v. PASCHIM BANGA GRAMIN BANK AND ORS.
WPA/25882/2022 · 2025-04-30
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45061 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45061 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
30.04.2025 8 Ct.No.7 sdas
WPA 25882 of 2022
Sadhan Kumar Dey Vs. Paschim Banga Gramin Bank & Ors.
Mr. Baidurya Ghosal Ms. Anupama Biswas Mr. Sourav Mukherjee …. for the respondents
…. for the respondent No. 1
Petitioner is unrepresented. Mr. Ghosal, learned advocate representing the respondent Bank submits the issue raised in this writ petition has already been settled. In view of the above, no further interference is called for. The writ petition is, thus, disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)