Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45058 (RAJ)

SMT. SAVITA SHARMA W/O SHRI AMIT SHARMA v. AJAY PAREEK

CMA/1985/2025 · 2025-10-09

Maneesh Sharma

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41221] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1985/2025 Smt. Savita Sharma W/o Shri Amit Sharma, aged about 45 Years, R/o 1899, Bhatto Ki Gali, Opp. Purani Vidhansabha, Badi Chaupad, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Ajay Pareek, Chief Business Officer M/s Fullerton India Private Limited Corporative Office-5 & 6, B-Wing, Supreme Business Pareek Supreme City, Povai, Mumbai and 3rd Floor, No. 307, Megh Tower, PH Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai. 2. Shirish Opte, Chairman and Director, M/s Fullerton India Private Limited Corporative Office- 5 & 6, B-Wing, Supreme Business Pareek Supreme City, Povai, Mumbai. 3. Sudha Pillai, Director, M/s Fullerton India Private Limited Corporative Office- 5 & 6, B-Wing, Supreme Business Pareek Supreme City, Povai, Mumbai And 3rd Floor, No. 307, Megh Tower, PH Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai. 4. Shantunu Mitra, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, M/s Fullerton India Private Limited Corporative Office- 5 & 6, B-Wing, Supreme Business Pareek Supreme City, Povai, Mumbai. 5. Neeraj Pareek, The Then Authorized Officer, Address- Plot No. 161, 162, 173 And 174, 4th Floor, Bansal Tower, Rathore Nagar, Amrapali Marg, Vaishali, Jaipur. 6. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Raashi Dogra Dudi, The Then Deputy Commissioner of Police (North), Address City Palace, Jalebi Chowk, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Lakhan Singh Khatana, The Then SHO, Police Station Ramganj, Jaipur. 8. Banne Singh, S.I., The Then Police Station Ramganj, Jaipur, R/o DD-74, Pashupati Nath Colony, Near Nepali Temple, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vikram Beniwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Madhav Mitra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Vineet Sharma Ms. Neha Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 09/10/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:41221] (2 of 2) [CMA-1985/2025] 1. Learned counsel for the appellant, after arguing the matter at some length, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy under the law. 2. Permission sought for is granted. 3. Accordingly, the present misc. appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. 4. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /53