0 APHC010016972022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 22 OF 2022 Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 of C.P.C, against the Judgment dated 06.09.2021 passed in lA. No.773 of 2020 in AS. No.11 of 2017 by the learned Principal District Judge, Kurnool. Between: Shaik Abdul Rahiman, S/o Shaik Buden Saheb, Muslim, aged about 61 years, R/o Near old bus stand, Velugodu (P & M), Kurnool District. ...Appellant AND Mukamalla Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, S/o late M. Lakshmi Reddy, aged about 56 years, Velugodu (P & M), Kurnool District Hindu ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY the execution of decree/judgment dated 11.12.2015 passed in OS. No. 4 of 2012 by the Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri P Rajasekhar Counsel for the Respondent: Smt Marella Radha The Court made the following : APHC010016972022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 22/2022 Between: 1.SHAIK ABDUL RAHIMAN,, S/0 SHAIK BUDEN SAHEB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/0 NEAR OLD BUSSTAND, VELUGODU (P AND M), KURNOOL DT. ...APPELLANT AND 1.MUKAMALLA VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY, S/o late M. Lakshmi Reddy, Hindu, aged about 56 years, Velugodu (P and M), Kurnool dt ...RESPONDENT against orderspleased to SET ASIDE the order dated 06.09.2021 passed in lA. No. 773 of 2020 in AS. No. 11 of 2017 by the learned Principal District Judge, Kurnool and ALLOW the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in the interest of justice and in ,the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Appeal Under Section Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased In these circumstances, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to STAY of execution of decree/judgment dated 11.12.2015 passed in OS. No. 4 of 2012 by the Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur in the interest of justice and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2022 praying that in the 2 CGR,J CMA No.22 of 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC prayinq that in th« circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition the H,gh Court ntay be pleased Pleased to extend ^^^0 14 w wUTin th° """ 31-01-2022 passed in justice ® appeal in the iLrest of Counsel for the Appellant: 1.PRAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1.MARELLA RADHA The Court made the following: 3 CGR,J CMA No.22 of 2022 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the appeal does not survive for further adjudication and that the interim order granted by this Court was also vacated due to non- compliance with the conditions imposed. In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal District Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool District 2. One CC to Sri. P Rajasekhar Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Smt. Marella Radha Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies Stu nm HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025 JUDGMENT CMA NO. 22 OF 2022 Of AND/^ X!’ o cs 2 7 OCT 2025 .at m '3^ c-s ^xCurrentSsctioj r>^ n ^OS’.Vr-r: .^SPA V.. u i DISMISSING THE CMA FOR NON PROSECUTION