Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45054 (AP)

M KRISHNAIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/4082/2024 · 2025-12-23

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010075742024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 4082/2024 Between: 1. M KRISHNAIAH, S/O.LATE M.SIDHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, BC. COLONY, BHAKARAPETA VILLAGE, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. . 4. THE THASILDAR, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the respondents No. 3 and 4 in interfering with petitioner rights over the land in an extant of Ac. 3.30 Cents in Sy.No.329/ll/BD, of Bhakarapeta Village, fields Chinnagottigallu Mandal, Tirupati District, assigned to petitioner instead of mutating the revenue records pertaining to the same in petitioner favor as arbitrary, illegal. abdication statutory duty cast upon them apart from being voilative of fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents No.3 and 4 to consider the petitioner representation, dated 09-05-2023 by mutating the revenue records in petitioner favor for the land in an extant of Ac. 3.30 Cents in Sy.No.329/11/BD, of Bhakarapeta Village, fields Chinnagottigallu Mandal, Tirupati District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 and 4 not to dispossess petitioner from the land in an extant of Ac. 3.30 Cents in Sy.No.329/11/BD, of Bhakarapeta Village, fields Chinnagottigallu Mandal, Tirupati District without following due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 4082/2024 ORDER: 1. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh writ petition. No costs. 4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Date:24.12.2025 BV