Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4505 (KER)

ANJANA V.R. v. A.KRISHNAMMA

OP(C)/690/2025 · 2025-03-25

P M Manoj

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:26441 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1947 OP(C) NO. 690 OF 2025 PETITIONERS: ANJANA V.R. AGED 54 YEARS D/O.THE LATE M.N.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, 40 F9, MAYURA, PERUMAL NAGAR 111, ASARIPALLAM P.O., K.K. DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU., PIN - 629201 BY ADVS. M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR K.JOHN MATHAI JOSON MANAVALAN PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM CHETHAN KRISHNA R. RESPONDENTS: 1 A.KRISHNAMMA T.C.18/368, KUNNIL VEEDU, PUNNACKAMUKAL, THIRUMALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695501 2 A. SWARNNAMMA (DIED) T.C.16/108, VAYALIL VEEDU, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695501 3 V.SURENDRAN ALIAS SOORYACHANDRAN THULASI NIVAS, MUDAVOORPARA, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695501 4 V.RAJU T.C.18/581(1), PADMAJA NIVAS, MUDAVOORPARA, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695501 O.P.(C) No.690 of 2025 2 2025:KER:26441 5 V.SREEKUMAR T.C.18/274, KAMALA BHAVAN, MUDAVOORPARA, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695501 6 V.MADHUSOODANAN T.C.18/582(1), KAMALA NIVAS, MUDAVOORPARA, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695501 7 V.APPUKUTTAN T.C.18/580(1), SARANYA NIVAS, KARUMPILKONAM, MUDAVOORPARA, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695501 8 V.SIVANKUTTY T.C.18/588, ‘SIVASAKTHI’, MUDAVOORPARA, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695501 THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C) No.690 of 2025 3 2025:KER:26441 P.M. MANOJ, J ------------------------------ O.P.(C) No.690 of 2025 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2025 JUDGMENT This matter was already heard on 14.03.2025. Being satisfied with the contentions raised in the Original Petition, an explanation was sought from the 1st Additional Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram. In compliance with the said direction it is reported that the maintainability petition was disposed and the execution petition was dismissed. Under such circumstances, nothing survives in the Original Petition. Accordingly, the Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- P.M.MANOJ JUDGE sss