IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.882 of 2025 Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Anita Kumari ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Sarita, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, stated that judgment under reference has duly been complied with in its letter and spirit. 2. Learned vice counsel for the petitioner, acknowledges the factum with regard to compliance of judgment under reference. 3. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 03, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?