Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45048 (AP)

ALLA SUBBAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/307/2025 · 2025-04-29

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

•' ■ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH.:AIVIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF , „ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI WRIT PETITION NO: .?n7 of 2025 APRIL lo Ltd RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD ■ Between: Alla Subbamma, W/o. Anjaneya Reddy, Age Tripurantakam Mandal, Prakasam District. 50 years, R/o, Somepalli Village, ...Petitioner AND ’ ^anchaym Raj A‘^ Secretary, Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur, Guntur Set, Secretariat 3. The District Collector Ongole. and District Magistrate, Prakasam District, ' ingote"'' Officer, Zilla Praja Parishad, Prakasam District, Tripurantakam^Prakl^m Disiricr®"' ‘'''‘'P'J''eetakam ®- ViHagt ™;furamak"am"Mandlk1?r^^^^^^^ Thripurantaka Mandal, m ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ffie circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction nature of Writ praying that in more particularly one in the declaring the of Mandamus proceedings 13-11-2024 issued by the 3rd Respondent i the 6th RespondentA/ice m Rc.No.P1/1371/2024, dated deciding to continue in President-11 of the Tripurantakam Mandal to exercise the powers and perform the functions of president of Mandal Praja Parishad Tripurantakam Mandal of Prakasam District until new president is elected without assigning any continue the 6th respondent ignoring the petitioner/Vice-Preside nt-l candidature, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set a-side the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.Pl/1371/2024, dated 13-11- reason to 2024 issued by the 3rd Respondent with a direction to appoint the petitionerA/ice President-1 to ex^eise the powers and perform the functions of president of Mandal Praja Parishad Tripurantakam Mandal of Prakasam District until new president is elected lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15T CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to re-consider the petitioner representation, dated 04-10- 2024 by suspending the operation of impugned proceedings in Rc.No:.P1/1371/2024, dated 13-11-2024 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G MALLIKARJUNA REDDY REPRENSETED FOR SRI G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.4, 5: SRI MATTEiGUNTA SUDHIR The Court made the following: Order APHC010004042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) IP [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 307/2025 Between: 1.ALLA SUBBAMMA, W/0. ANJANEYA REDDY, AGE 50 YEARS, R/0. SOMEPALLI VILLAGE, TRIPURANTAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR, DISTRICT. GUNTUR 2.THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PATHURU ROAD, BESIDE RELIANCE DIGITALS, TADEPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 4.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 5.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TRIPURANTAKAM MANDAL, TRIPURANTAKAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6.GOTTEMUKKALA REBKA, W/0. PRASAD, AGE 61 YEARS, R/0. THRIPURANTAKAM VILLAGE, THRIPURANTAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2.K ARUNA The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri G. Mallikarjuna Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Sri G. Venkata Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner submits that the grievance raised by the Writ Petitioner in this Writ Petition has been redressed and no further orders are required. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. SDI- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// jIuM> SECTION OFFICER ^ To, District Magistrate ^ Chief Executive Ongole. Pathuru Prakasam District, Officer, Zilla Praja Parishad, Prakasam District, TripuraSarri'^Prltesam DisIriCt"'®"' ™Piirantakam Mandal, 6 One CC to SRI G VENKATA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] And°hr“p=ri°de?ri",SS?, "^"^HAYAT RAd RURAL DEV, High Court of ' S"p^P,"G^ra‘^ PanchaTaKc™ Standing Counsel for ZPP 9- Three CD Copies high court DATED: 30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.307 of 2025 m SEP 2025 K i»TentSecti» -Se6JQ. Co disposing the wp WITHOUT COSTS AS INFRUCTUOUS