Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45047 (CHH)

MAHESH PRASAD KHARE v. MR. NAVIN KUMAR MEHTA

CONT/96/2025 · 2025-01-21

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:3531 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 96 of 2025 • Mahesh Prasad Khare, S/o Late Shri D. R. Khare, Aged About 62 Years, Working As Executive Engineer At Chhattisgarh Gramin Sadak Vikas Abhikaran, (Project Implementation Unit-1) Manendragarh, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) (Petitioner In W.P.S No. 7236/2024) ... Petitioner/Applicant versus 1. Mr. Navin Kumar Mehta, Superintendent Engineer, Chhattisgarh Gramin Sadak Vikas Abhikaran, Project Circle No.-2, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) (Respondent No.-2 In W.P.S. No. 7236/2024). 2. Shri Motiram Singh, Assistant Engineer, In-Charge Executive Engineer, Project Implementation Unit, Korea, District Korea (C.G.) Now Posted At- Chhattisgarh Gramin Sadak Vikas Abhikaran (Project Implementation Unit-1) Manendragarh, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) (Respondent No.- 3 In W.P.S. No. 7236/2024). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner/Applicant : Ms. Shrijita Kesharwani, Advocate. For respondents : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 21/01/2025 1. This Contempt petition has been preferred by the applicant under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 for non-compliance of the order dated 13.11.2024 passed in WP(S) No.7236/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that order under contempt has been complied with by the respondent authorities and applicant is fully satisfied with the said compliance. 3. In view of the fact that respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 13.11.2024 passed in WP(S) No.7236/2024 of this Court, as contended by the counsel for the applicant. Thus, no case of contempt is 2 made out, as such I do not find any reason to proceed further in the matter, initiating contempt proceeding against the respondents. 4. Accordingly, contempt proceeding is dropped. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Date: 2025.01.21 17:07:43 +0530