■^S IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10938 OF 2025 Between: Chatrathi Vijayanand, S/o Late Sei Venugopala Rao, Aged about 80 years Occ; Cultivation, R/o Tedlam Village, T Narsapuram Mandal, Eluru District Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, A.P.Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The District Collector,Eluru District, at Eluru, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Joint Collector, Eluru District at Eluru, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Tahsildar, T Narsapuram Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in considering petitioner's representation Dt. 02-04-2025 for recording our rights, possession and enjoyment in the web records over the land to an extent of Ac. 1.70 cents in RS No 4 of Krishnaraopalem Village, T Narsapuram Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh is highly illegal, arbitrary exercise of power, violative of principles of Natural Justice and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation made by ' me and record my name in the web records forthwith. lANO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dt.02-04-2025 and pass appropriate orders pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER € APHC010211562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10938/2025 Between; ...PETITIONER Chatrathi Vijayanand AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following; ; / 2 4 NV,J W.P. NO. 10938 OF 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10938/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: “ to issue a writ order or direction more particulariy one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus deciaring the inaction of the 3'''^ respondent in considering petitioner’s representation Dt.02.04.2025 for recording our rights, possession and enjoyment in the web records over the land to an extent of Ac.1-70 cents in RS.No.4 of Krishnaraopalem Village, T Narsapuram Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh is highly illegal, arbitrary, exercise of power, violative of principles of Natural Justice and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation made by me and record my name in the web records forthwith and pass....” Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government 2. Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 02.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 02.04.2025 pending with the authorities, within a reasonable time. 4. 3 NV, J W. P.NO.l0938 OF 2025 In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader for 5. Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh^”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated 02.04.2025, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to 6. consider and dispose of the representation dated 02.04.2025, after providing opportunity pf shearing to the petitioner as well as other stake holders, if any, within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ^ 2004 (1) see 769 Sd/- K.J.RAJA BABU assistant registrar //TRUE eOPY// SEeTlON OFFieER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A.P.Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Eluru District, at Eluru, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Joint Collector, Eluru District at Eluru, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Tahsildar, T Narsapuram Mandal, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. One CC to Sri Turaga Sai Surya Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] - 7. Three CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10938 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS