Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45038 (PNJ)

GURMEJ SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/20204/2025 · 2025-07-14

Manjari Nehru Kaul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

323. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Gurmej Singh and others State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. dated 26.02.2024 at Police Station consequential compromise (Annexure P 2. directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. 3. Magistrate First Class, Gurdaspur Court, wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Gurmej Singh and others Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Utkrant Mahajan, Advocate, for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Rana, Senior DAG, Pu Ms. Bindu Bala, Advocate, for Mr. Vishal Munjal, Advocate, for respondent ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition 26.02.2024, under Sections 326, 323, 324, 452, 34 of IPC at Police Station Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur consequential proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at, between the parties. Vide order dated 21.04.2025 directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between Report has since been received from learned Magistrate First Class, Gurdaspur, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20204-2025 Date of decision: 14.07.2025 .... Petitioners .... Respondents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Utkrant Mahajan, Advocate, for , Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Rana, Senior DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Ms. Bindu Bala, Advocate, for , Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. is for quashing of FIR No.11, 326, 323, 324, 452, 34 of IPC, registered Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1) and all proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of between the parties. of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between ince been received from learned Judicial , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the 1, , registered and all proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of , the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between Judicial , in pursuance of the directions of this SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.07.14 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-20204-2025 - 2 - parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the complainant and injured i.e. respondents No.2 and 3 have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. 4. The Trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties, in original, alongwith its report. 5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondents No.2 and 3 are the only aggrieved persons in the FIR in question. 6. In view of the report of learned trial Court and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed qua petitioners. 7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE July 14, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.07.14 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document