HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 5388 of 2024 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous, and therefore, it may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. Sri Deepak Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer so made. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 24, 2025 Pratima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R. K. Singh Kaosik Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Anil Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad