Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45023 (CHH)

OM PRAKASH SONI v. UNION OF INDIA

WPC/114/2023 · 2025-04-01

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15240 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 114 of 2023 1 - Om Prakash Soni S/o Late Shri Heera Ram Soni Aged About 56 Years R/o Village - Baloda, Tahsil - Baloda, Civil And Revenue District - Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through - The Secretary Ministry Of Road Transport And Highway, Transport Bhawan - 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi 110001. 2 - Chairman, National Highway Authority Of India, Nhai Head Quarter, G-5 And 6, Sector - 10 Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Chief Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Commissioner, Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 5 - The Collector, Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District - Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Cum Land Acquisition Officer Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District - Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Tahsildar Baloda, Civil And Revenue District - Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh. 8 - The Revenue Inspector, Revenue Circle Baloda, Civil And Revenue District - Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh. 9 - The Patwari, Halka No. 17, Baloda, Civil And Revenue District - Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ Union of India : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, CGC. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Government Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/04/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3 2. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat