[2025:RJ-JP:44616] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16544/2025 Sumitra Gurjar D/o Chhitar Lal Gurjar, W/o Lokesh Kumar Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Salpura Road, Harnawada Jagir (Chhipabaroad) District Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director Elementary, Education Officer, Bikaner 3. Director Secondary Education Officer, Bikaner 4. Joint Director, School Education, Kota Division Kota 5. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Baran 6. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma and Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/11/2025 1. Ms. Pooja Sharma on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondents No.3, 4, 5 and 6, whereas Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG on behalf of respondent No.2 and Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG for respondent No.1. 2. Office is directed to reflect the names of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG, Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG and Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur as counsel for respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:44616] (2 of 2) [CW-16544/2025] 3. Learned counsel for petitioner while referred order dated 18.01.2022 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.909/2022 titled as Vinita Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the petitioner has filed a writ petition for transfer and adjustment of petitioner on post of Teacher Gr.III Level II at nearby place in home Block Chhipabaroad, District Baran, where a post is lying vacant. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that if petitioner would submit representation, the same shall be considered in accordance with the policy. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After arriving at decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /45