Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45015 (CAL)

HASANUR RAHAMAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/26470/2024 · 2025-01-30

Arindam Mukherjee

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30.01.2025 Court No.23 ML/Item No.–46 [Milan, A.R. (Ct.)] IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 26470 of 2024 Hasanur Rahaman versus The Union of India & Ors. Mr. Malay Bhattacharyya, Mr. Sudip Sengupta ….for the petitioner Mr. Ram Chandra Agarwal, Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Mr. Rivu Dutta, Mr. Rhitam Chatterjee ….for the Respondents Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. It is submitted by the petitioner that the height of the petitioner is 169.6 cm. and as such is entitled to the benefit for being considered to be 170 cm in height for being permitted to appear in the Physical Efficiency Test (in short, “PET”) under Constable (General Duty) in Central Armed Police Forces (in short, “CAPFs”), Secretariat Security Force (in short, “SSF”), Riflemen (General Duty) in Assam Rifles (in short, “AR”) and Sepoy in Narcotics Control Bureau (in short, “NCB”) Examination, 2024. 2 However, the overall marks of the petitioner is below the cut-off marks and as such no fruitful purpose will be fulfilled in pressing the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefor, dismissed for non- prosecution. (Arindam Mukherjee, J.)