Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4501 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA S/O LALLU RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1128/2025 · 2025-05-09

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19624] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1128/2025 Rajendra S/o Lallu Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Maharajpura, P.s. Bassi Jaipur District, Rajasthan. Present Address - Tenant Plot No. 10 A, Choudhary Charan Singh Colony, P.s. Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City. (Presently Accused In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Rajawat for Mr. Deepak Chauhan Mr. Shubham Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Deen Dayal Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/05/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.274/2024 registered at Police Station-Jamwaramgarh, District-Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the name of petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR. [2025:RJ-JP:19624] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1128/2025] Initially the FIR was registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 for the offence of cheating. No identification parade was conducted. Counsel further submits that as per the CCTV footage, petitioner was not present at the time of incident. Though there are the recovery of certain amount but that amount has been assigned to him by co-accused. No identification parade was conducted. Petitioner is behind the bars since 01.01.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed and no previous case is registered against the petitioner. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Rajendra S/o Lallu Ram shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR ),J Arun/58