- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5929 CRL.A No. 100146 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100146 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. VAMSHI S/O. SATYANARAYA, AGE: 22 YEAS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SANGAPUR, TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL – 583 227. 2. SUKUR SAB S/O. MOULALI MAKANDAR, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O: WARD NO. 24, LVT COLONY GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL – 583 227. 3. H. SUDEEP S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BASAPATTANA, TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL – 583 227. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K. S. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH GANGAVATHI Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5929 CRL.A No. 100146 of 2025 RURAL POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AG OFFICE, DHARWAD – 580 001. 2. SIDDAPPA S/O. MARTHANDAPPA, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: LABOURER, R/O: SANGAPUR, TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL-583227 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1; R2 – SERVED) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 14 A(2) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT 1989, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS 1 TO 3/ACCUSED NO.1, 4, 6 ON REGULAR BAIL IN GANGAVATHI RURAL P.S. CRIME NO.298/2024 REGISTERED FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 189(2), 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 190 OF BNS 2023 AND SECTIONS 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(V-a) OF SC AND ST POA ACT 1989, PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOPPAL (SITTING AT GANGAVATHI) BY INVOKING SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF SECTION 14A(2) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT 1989 AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.01.2025 IN CRIME NO.298/2024, PASSED BY THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOPPAL (SITTING AT GANGAVATHI), THEREBY ALLOWING THE PRESENT APPEAL TO SERVE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5929 CRL.A No. 100146 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellants files a memo not pressing the appeal in respect of appellant No.1-accused No.2. The memo reads thus; “NOT PRESSED MEMO IN RESPECT OF APPELLANT NO.1 The Advocate for the Appellant submits as under, The present appeal seeking bail in respect of Appellant No.1 may kindly be taken as not pressed as the Appellant is pursuing bail remedy before the Trial Court. Hence this memo.” The appeal filed by appellant Nos.2 and 3-accused Nos.4 and 6 has already been dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 19.03.2025. The appeal is filed by appellant Nos.1 to 3-accused Nos.1, 4 and 6. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. SD/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE PJ/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1