IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.708 of 2025 ------ 1. Sanjay Mahra @ Sanjay Mehra, aged about 47 years, son of Narayan Mahra, R/O Village- Gobarshala, P.O. + P.S.- Pathardda, District- Deoghar. 2. Ritesh Das @ Ritesh Mahra, Aged about 27 years, S/O- Late Nuneshwar Das @ Das 3. Bablu Mahra @ Bablu Mehra, Aged about 41 years, S/O – Narayan Mahra 4. Lalan Mahra @ Lalan Mehra @ Lalan Das, Aged about 20 years, S/O Sanjay Mahra, Petitioner Nos.2, 3, 4 are R/O Village- Bobarshala, Gobarshala, P.O. + P.S.- Pathardda, District- Deoghar .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 05-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No.121 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 109 (1), 303 (2), 352 351 (2), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Bhaskar Kumar Das and Mahendra Mahra who sustained injuries on their hands and the informant- Ranjeet Kumar Das who sustained simple injuries on his head. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further submitted that the alleged injuries were caused by hard and blunt object. It is further submitted that for the self-same occurrence, Sarath P.S. Case No.122 of 2024 has also been instituted from the side of the petitioners against the informant party. It is also submitted that there was a free fight between the parties and the petitioners had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that there is a delay of one day in lodging the F.I.R. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victims or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Madhupur in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No.121 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victims or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/