Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45007 (PNJ)

KULDEEP KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/20631/2025 · 2025-08-07

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-20631 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (114) KULDEEP KAUR STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to official respondents No.2 and 3 to conduct a free and fair investigation by taking appropriate legal action against respondent No petitioner. 2. counsel has filed a status report by way of an affidavit of Sh. Gurwinder Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Amritsar (Rural), on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, which is taken on record. 3. 20631-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH KULDEEP KAUR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Angrej Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate for respondents No.4,5, 7, 9 and 10 ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to official respondents No.2 and 3 to conduct a free and fair investigation by taking appropriate legal action against respondent No In compliance with the order dated 28.07.2025, learned State counsel has filed a status report by way of an affidavit of Sh. Gurwinder Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub (Rural), on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, which is taken on A perusal of paragraph 5 of the status report reads as under: -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20631-2025 Date of Decision:- 07.08.2025 ……petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Angrej Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. for respondents No.4,5, 7, 9 and 10 he present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to official respondents No.2 and 3 to conduct a free and fair investigation by taking appropriate legal action against respondent No.4 for causing injuries to the In compliance with the order dated 28.07.2025, learned State counsel has filed a status report by way of an affidavit of Sh. Gurwinder Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Ajnala, (Rural), on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, which is taken on e status report reads as under: - 07.08.2025 ……petitioners ……Respondents he present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to official respondents No.2 and 3 to conduct a free and fair investigation by taking .4 for causing injuries to the In compliance with the order dated 28.07.2025, learned State counsel has filed a status report by way of an affidavit of Sh. Gurwinder Division Ajnala, (Rural), on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, which is taken on MANJU 2025.08.12 10:26 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-20631 4. not press the present petition and prays for withdrawal with liberty to proceed in accordance with law as the relief sought in the present petition would not survive. 5. the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, August 07, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 20631-2025 5.That the deponent submits that on the basis of the aforesaid statement a cross case vide G.D. No.16 dated 27.07.2025, under Sections 115(2), 74, 324(4) and 190 BNS was registered in the present cas 6.That the deponent humbly submits that the petitioner is absconding to avoid her arrest in main case. Therefore, her statement could not be recorded. 7.That in view of th circumstances, the present petition has become infructuous and liable to be dismissed. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition and prays for withdrawal with liberty to oceed in accordance with law as the relief sought in the present petition would not survive. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, August 07, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2- 5.That the deponent submits that on the basis of the aforesaid statement a cross case vide G.D. No.16 dated , under Sections 115(2), 74, 324(4) and 190 BNS was registered in the present case. 6.That the deponent humbly submits that the petitioner is absconding to avoid her arrest in main case. Therefore, her statement could not be recorded. 7.That in view of the above detailed facts and circumstances, the present petition has become infructuous and liable to be dismissed. with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition and prays for withdrawal with liberty to oceed in accordance with law as the relief sought in the present petition Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE - 5.That the deponent submits that on the basis of the aforesaid statement a cross case vide G.D. No.16 dated , under Sections 115(2), 74, 324(4) and 190 6.That the deponent humbly submits that the petitioner is absconding to avoid her arrest in main case. e above detailed facts and circumstances, the present petition has become with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition and prays for withdrawal with liberty to oceed in accordance with law as the relief sought in the present petition Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, MANJU 2025.08.12 10:26 I agree to specified portions of this document