p. 1 $~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 634/2024 MANYA SHARMA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Saurabh D. Karan Singh, Mr. Akash Kumar, Mr. Sanjay Shisodia, Advocates versus PUNITA BHALLA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu, Mr. Vikas Sareen & Mr. Ayush Mittal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 08.04.2025 1. This matter has been put up on an office note. The paragraph 6 of the dated 08.01.2025 records that the suit is decreed in terms of the settlement agreement dated 16.12.2024 but as per record, the date of Settlement Agreement is 17.12.2024 and not 16.12.2024. 2. Accordingly, the order dated 08.01.2025 is corrected to read as under with the correction at paragraph 6 being highlighted in bold and underlined: “$~28 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 634/2024, I.As. 36125/2024, 36127/2024 & 39693/2024 MANYA SHARMA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Saurabh D. Karan Singh, Mr. Akash Kumar, Mr. Sanjay Shisodia, Advocates This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 12:40:25 p. 2 versus PUNITA BHALLA & ORS. .....Defendant Through: Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu, Mr. Vikas Sareen & Mr. Ayush Mittal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 08.01.2025 I.A. 291/2025 (Under Order XXIII Rules 1 & 3 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) 1. This application has been filed seeking disposal of the suit in terms of settlement between the parties dated 16th December 2024, arrived at with the facilitation of the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. The settlement agreement is on record of this Court. 2. The Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful and in order. The parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement. 3. The said settlement has been executed and signed by the respective parties as also counter signed by respective counsel for the parties. 4. Counsel for plaintiff states that the procedure for transfer of the car in the plaintiff’s name, as per Clause C.1.(ii) and disbursal of Rs.10,00,000/-. (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) from the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (“EPFO”) account of Late Mr. Chetan Bhalla, as per Clause D.3, has already been triggered by them and they will make efforts to ensure that the same is concluded expeditiously. 5. In view of the joint request, the application is allowed. 6. The suit stands disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement dated 17th December 2024. 7. Decree sheet be drawn accordingly. 8. Application stands disposed of. CS(OS) 634/2024 1. In view of the settlement arrived at through mediation, plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of 100 % court fee. 2. Registry is directed accordingly. 3. Date of 21st March 2025, fixed earlier, stands cancelled. ANISH DAYAL, J This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 12:40:25 p. 3 JANUARY 8, 2025/sm/sc” 3. In view of the above, the office note stands addressed. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J APRIL 8, 2025/msh Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 12:40:25