Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45002 (KAR)

THE BRANCH MANAGER v. SRI ANAND S/O NAGAPPA MURAGOD

MFA/101158/2017 · 2025-04-07

Umesh M Adiga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6103 MFA No. 101158 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101158 OF 2017 (MV-I) BETWEEN: THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE KATAGI BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, KACHERI ROAD, JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MARUTI GALLI, BELAGAVI. REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NAGANAGOUDA R. KUPPELUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. ANAND S/O. NAGAPPA MURAGOD, AGE 33 YEARS, OCC: NOW NIL, (AGRI. COOLIE), R/O. MUNAVALLI, TQ: SAUNDATTI AND DT. BELAGAVI. 2. SRI. SURESH, S/O. BHEEMAPPA KABBUR, AGE MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE/BUSINESS, R/O. RANGAPURA, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. (OWNER OF THE TRACTOR TRAILER). 3. SMT. PARAVVA, W/O. BASAVANNI NINGANUR, AGE MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE/HOUSEHOLD WORKS, Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6103 MFA No. 101158 of 2017 R/O. PALABHAVI, TQ: RAIBAG, DIST:BELAGAVI. (OWNER OF THE HINDUSTAN TRACTOR TRAILER). …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GURURAJ R. TURAMARI, ADV. FOR R1; SRI. Y. LAKSHMIKANT REDDY, ADV. FOR R2 & R3) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS CONNECTED WITH AWARD AND JUDGMENT MADE IN MVC NO.2471/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT SAUNDATTI AND SET ASIDE THE AWARD DATED 28.11.2016 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA) 1. Heard the learned counsel for both sides. 2. This appeal is filed by the insurance company/respondent No.3 in MVC No.2471/2011 against the judgment and award dated 28.11.2016 by the Senior Civil Judge and Addl.MACT, Saundatti (for short, ‘the Tribunal’), challenging its liability to pay compensation. 3. The parties are referred to as per their rankings before the Tribunal. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6103 MFA No. 101158 of 2017 4. As per the contents of the impugned judgment it appears that three cases were lodged by different claimants to claim compensation, namely, MVC No.558/2011, MVC No.710/2013, along with the present MVC. 5. Learned counsel for both sides submits that the judgment and award passed in MVC No.558/2011 and MVC No.710/2013 were challenged before this Court in the case of The Divisioinal Manager Vs.Smt.Laxmi in MFA No.100149/2017, clubbed with MFA No.100150/2017. Both appeals were disposed of by a common judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 04.02.2021, in which it was held that the insurance company shall pay compensation with a liberty to recover the same from the owner of the vehicle. The rate of interest was also modified from 9% to 6% per annum. It is further submitted that in this appeal, the appellant/insurance company challenges its liability to pay compensation as well as the rate of interest. The appellant - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6103 MFA No. 101158 of 2017 contends that the driver of the offending tractor-trailer had no valid and effective driving licence and therefore the respondent/insurer is not liable to pay compensation. However, considering this contention, the Coordinate Bench in the aforementioned judgment held that the owner is liable and, referring to the judgment in the case of New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Bijapur Vs.Yallavva W/o. Yamanappa Dharanakeri and another reported in 2020(2) AKR 484, directed the insurer to pay the compensation, with the right to recover the same. This appeal can be disposed of on the same terms. 6. All the three cases referred above were tried together and disposed of by the Tribunal. Two claimants in the two cases referred above preferred appeals in the above two MFAs. Hence order passed in the said two MFAs are also applicable to facts of this case. In the same line this appeal shall also to be disposed. Accordingly, this Court passed the following: - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6103 MFA No. 101158 of 2017 ORDER i. Appeal is allowed. ii. The impugned judgment and award passed in MVC No.2471/2011 dated 28.11.2016 by the Senior Civil Judge and Addl.MACT, Saundatti is modified. iii. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are held liable to pay compensation. Respondent No.3, being the insurer, shall pay the said amount of compensation, with liberty to recover the same from respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in appropriate proceedings. iv. The rate of interest awarded by the Tribunal is reduced to 6% per annum. v. Any amount deposited by the appellant shall be transmitted to the Tribunal. vi. Send back copy of this Judgment to the Tribunal with TCR. Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE KGK /CT-AN /List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18