RAVI AND ANUR OVERSEAS v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANR
W.P.(C)/2194/2025 · 2025-03-10
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, Yashwant Varma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45002 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45002 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2194/2025
RAVI AND ANUR OVERSEAS
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Gupta, Mr. Rahul Gupta & Ms. Bhavya Talwar, Advs.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND ANR
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R %
10.03.2025
1. We had on the previous occasion required the respondents to obtain appropriate instructions bearing in mind the allegations leveled by the writ petitioner that it had derived knowledge of the impugned
order only on 03 February 2025 since the Show Cause Notice [“SCN”] had come to be placed in the “Additional Notices & Orders” tab.
2. Although Ms. Gupta, learned counsel has appeared, the respondents have failed to provide her appropriate instructions.
3. We bear in consideration identical questions which had been raised in previous writ petitions with respect to notices being placed under the „Additional Notices and Orders‟ tab and during the
consideration of which the respondents had made a disclosure that appropriate corrective measures on the Goods and Services Tax This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 18:37:30
Network [“GSTN”] portal came to be adopted only on 16 January
2024.
4. Since the notice in the present case was undisputedly issued prior thereto, we find no justification to retain the writ petition on our board and which shall stand disposed of on the following terms.
5. We grant the writ petitioner two weeks‟ time to respond to the SCN and to submit its detailed response to the same. The aforesaid reply may be duly examined and considered by the competent authority of the respondents and a reasoned and speaking order passed within a period of three weeks therefrom.
6. The order of 24 September 2023, which stands impugned in the present writ petition shall abide by the fresh decision which the respondents shall now take.
7. All rights and contentions of respective parties on merits are kept open.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
MARCH 10, 2025/v This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 18:37:30